Monday, November 13, 2006

The End of the World

DON'T PANIC. This has nothing to do with the Apocalypse. This is about something called "the end of the world effect", which I will abbreviate as EWE. It is a phenomenon commonly applied to wargames, but is also present in euros.

EWE occurs at the end of a game. In order to achieve a winning position/condition, players will often find themselves doing something "silly" or otherwise not in keeping with the game's theme or natural flow.

In wargames it's particularly obvious because your actions are more often grounded in reality. For example, you are playing an ASL scenario which requires the Germans to occupy a set of buildings by turn 5 in order to win. You advance your units carefully, pushing back the American defenders, using the buildings and terrain to your advantage, not exposing yourself when you would be mowed down. Suddenly, it's turn 5. You didn't make as much progress as you expected during the previous couple of turns. The only way to win is to get at least 2 units across the street alive.

The chances of any given unit making it are small, but you have 10 of them. One after the other, you run each unit across the open ground, using up the defender's firing opportunities, running through residual fire, watching the Desperation Morale counters pile up on broken half squads like graves. In the end, 2 units barely make it, and you win.

Victory feels a little hollow. You just lost (or lost control of) most of your units in 2 minutes. The 2 units occupying the buildings would surely not be able to hold if the game continued for even a single additional turn. Yet this is the way of things at the end of the world.

In euros, it doesn't feel so bad. Players are implementing mechanics to achieve a victory. You aren't really doing anything realistic, are you? Yes and no.

Even in euros, there's a sense of flow. There's an economy of resources, supply and demand, ebb and flow, etc. And there's often a theme of some kind which attempts to match up the mechanics with some real-world or fake-world activity. Even in these cases, EWE rears its head.

In Power Grid, you won't buy extra fuel on the final turn unless you are trying to screw another player out of it cheaply. Once you have sufficient power plants to power 17 (or whatever) cities, you will not buy new ones.

In St. Petersburg, players will use up all their remaining cash to buy Nobles and Noble Upgrades to squeeze out a few (!) extra VP.

I suppose EWE is generally considered a bad thing. One of the only solutions is for a given game to be part of some larger "campaign" so that the left-overs get carried over. This provides incentive to not do silly things. Of course, in euros this does not work.

What euro games have the worst EWE?

What euro games that could have bad EWE mitigate it best?

6 Comments:

At 4:03 PM, Anonymous Mark Christopher said...

I haven't played it in a while, but I recall that Serenissima had a major endgame problem. It was simple to mitigate it with house rules, at least. IIRC, the (common) house rules we used were to both vary the ending turn (based on a die roll) and making sailor worth victory points, so they aren't wasted in end-game attacks.

 
At 4:11 PM, Blogger Mark Haberman said...

Age of Steam comes to mind. Plopping down useless tracks just to get a few extra points.

Hey, two Mark Christophers in a row!

 
At 4:34 PM, Blogger hibikir said...

As far as lack of EWE goes, Louis XVI comes to mind. The shields awarded for pretty much anything that would not convert directly into victory points make sure that many turn 3 and turn 4 rewards are still valuable on the end game.

The only thing that is missing is some kind of reward for going for the high level missions in the last round. As it is, hard missions are almost never worth in in round 3, and strictly inferior to the easy ones in round 4.

 
At 6:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/2290
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/2289

 
At 6:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/2290
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/geeklist/2289

 
At 12:01 AM, Blogger Steve Janecek said...

I cant think of a particular game, but I can think of a scenario. Many games ahve victory conditions that are public and as a result, if one player nears this victory condition he often gets suicided on by other players.

Actually i can think of a particular game - Advnaced Civ, where you randomly sack cities with no hope of gaining land, but just to slightly hurt the point totals of other nations.

Not sure if that follows - but it seems to me

 

Post a Comment

<< Home